Monday, March 21, 2011

मुहम्मद का लिंग चमत्कार !

 B.N. Sharma             Represent: Dr. Santosh Rai 

यह एक अटल सत्य है कि "जैसी मति वैसी गति "अर्थात व्यक्ति जीवन जैसे विचार और आचार रखता है ,उसकी मौत भी वैसी ही होती है .मुसलमान भले मुहम्मद को रसूल और महापुरुष कहते रहें ,लेकिन वास्तव में वह एक अत्याचारी ,कामी और बलात्कारी व्यक्ति था .वह औरत के लिए ह्त्या भी करवाता था .मुहम्मद का यही दुर्गुण उसकी दर्दनाक मौत का कारण बन गया .मुहमद कुदरती मौत नहीं मरा ,उसकी जहर देकर ह्त्या की गयी थी .मुसलमान इस बात को छुपाते हैं .और टाल जाते हैं .लेकिन इसके पुख्ता सबूत मौजूद है .


1 -मुहमद की हत्या के निमित्त

हमने पिचले लेख में बताया था कि सन 628 में मुहम्मद ने अपने साथियों के सात बनू कुरेजा के कबीले पर धन के लिए हमला किया था .इस हमले उसने कबीले के यहूदी पुरुषों ,बच्चों और काबिले के सरदार "किनाना बिन अल रबी "की ह्त्या करा दी थी .और उसकी पत्नी साफिया के साथ जबरन शादी कर ली थी .और उसी दिन सफियाने मुहम्मद के खाने में जहर मिला दिया था .जो मुहम्मद के शरीर में धीमे धीमे असर करता रहा .और आखिर वह उसी जहर के कारण ऎसी मौत मरा कि मुसलमान दुनिया में यह बात बताने से कतराते हैं .

2 -साफिया ने मुहम्मद को जहर दिया

"अब्दुर रहमान बिन अबूबकर ने कहा कि रसूल ने एक भेड़का बच्चा जिबह किया ,और उसे पकाने के लिए साफिया के पास भिजवा दिया .साफिया ने उसे पकाया .बुखारी -जिल्द 3 किताब 47 हदीस 787

"अनस बिन मालिक ने कहा कि .रसूल की एक यहूदी पत्नी ने भेड़ का बच्चा पकाया था ,जिसमे जहर था .रसूल प्लेट से लेकर वह गोश्तखा गए

बुखारी -जिल्द 3 किताब 47 हदीस 786

3 -जहर से मुहम्मद बीमार रहता था

"आयशा ने कहा कि रसूल कहते थे कि मैं सीने में दर्द महसूस करता हूँ ,लगता है यह उसी खाने के कारण है ,जो मैंने खैबर के हमले के समय खाया था.मुझे ऐसा लगता है जैसे मेरे गर्दन की धमनी कट गयी हो .बुखारी- जिल्द 5 किताब 59 हदीस 713

4 -मुहम्मद मौत से डरता था -

"आयशा ने कहा कि उस दिन (मौत के दिन )रसूल के साथ सोने की मेरी बारी थी ,रसूल ने कहा मुझे पता नहीं है ,कि मैं कहाँ जाऊँगा ,कहाँ सोऊंगा और मेरे साथ कौन होगा .मैंने कहा यद्यपि मेरी बारी है ,फिर बी अप किसी के साथ सो सकते है .मुझे पता नहीं था कि रसूल अगली दुनिया की बात कर रहे थे ..बुखारी -जिल्द 7 कित्ताब 62 हदीस 144

5 -मुहम्मद की नफरत भरी इच्छा

"इब्ने अब्बास ने कहा जिस दिन रसूल मरे .वे मुझ से कह रहे थे ,सारे अरब से काफिरों ,यहूदियों और ईसाइयों को निकाल दो ,उनके उपासना स्थलों को गिरा दो .और उनको कबरिस्तान में बदल दो .बुखारी -जिल्द 4 किताब 56 हदीस 660

6 -मुहम्मद की मौत का हाल

मुहमद कि मौत 8 जून सन 632 को हुयी थी आयशा उसके साथ थी ,उसने कहता -

आयशा कहा कि रसूल की तबीयत खराब थी ,मैं पानी लेकर आई और रसूल को पानी पिला कर उनके चहरे पर पानी मला .रसूल आपने हाथ ऊपर करके कुछ कहना चाहते थे ,लेकिन उनके हाथ नीचे लटक गए .बुखारी -जिल्द 5 किताब 59 हदीस 730

"आयशा ने कहा कि उस दिन रसूल के साथ सोने की मेरी बारी थी ,रसूल मेरे पास थे ,लेकिन अल्लाह ने उन्हें उठा लिया.मरते समयुनका सर मेरे दोनों स्तनों के बीच था .उआकी लार मेरे थूक से मिल कर मेरी गर्दन से बह रही थी .बुखारी -जिल्द 7 किताब 62 हदीस 144 -145

"रसूल की लाश को अली बिन अबू तालिब और अल अब्बास ने पर पकड़ कर जमीन पर रख दिया .बुखारी -जिल्द 1 किताब 11 हदीस 634

7 -मुहम्मद का लिंग आकाश (अल्लाह )की तरफ था

'खर सुनते ही अली इब्ने अबू तालिब जो रसूल के दामाद और चचेरे भी थे आगये .उनहोंने देखा कि रसूल का बेजान जिस्म जमीन पर पडा है लेकिन उनका लिंग आसमान की तरफ खड़ा है .यह देखकर उमर खत्ताब ने रसूल के मरने से इंकार कर दिया .क्योंकि अली ने कहा था "يا أيها النبي القضيب خاصتك هو منتصب حتى السماء! " अंगरेजी में "O prophet thy penis erect unto sky "अबू दौउद -किताब 20 हदीस 3135

7 -विकी इस्लाम से इसके प्रमाण


In English, Ali ibn Abi Ṭalib, the fourth rightly guided Caliph of Islam (and also Muhammad's son-in-law and cousin) had exclaimed upon seeing Muhammad's lifeless corpse: "O prophet, thy penis is erect unto the sky!"


Unsurprisingly, this is one "miracle of Islam" that you will not find proudly displayed or posted in the many Islamic da‘wah (preaching) websites or forums.


Umar ibn al-Khattab, the second rightly guided Caliph of Islam, initially refused to believe Muhammad had died, and who could blame him when the prophet displayed such strong signs of life?



8 - मुहम्मद अपराधी था

मरने बाद इस तरह लिंग के खड़े रहने को "Death erection "या "angel lust "कहते है .यह उन्हीं के साथ होता है जो जघन्य अपराधी होते है ..इसके बारे में हिन्दी विकी पीडिया ने यह लिखा है-


मरणोत्तर स्तंभन (अंग्रेजी: Death Erection डेथ इरेक्शन), एक शैश्निक स्तंभन है और जिसे तकनीकी भाषा में प्रायापिज़्म कहते हैं, अक्सर उन पुरुषों के शव में देखने में आता है, जिनकी मृत्यु प्राणदंड, विशेष रूप से फांसी के कारण हुई हो।

9 -मुहम्मद का दफ़न

अब्दुलाह बिन अब्बास ने कहा कि रसूल को इसी दशा में नजरान के तीन कपड़ों में दफ़न कर दिया गया था .दो कपडे ऊपर के थे और एक नीचे तहमद थी अबू दौउद -किताब 20 हदीस 3147


अब हम कैसे मने कि मुहमद एक महा पुरुष या रसूल था .उसने अपने कुकर्मों का फल मरने बाद पा लिया .वह क़यामत तक इसी तरह अपना लिंग अल्लाह कि तरफ दिखाता रहेगा .


यदी किसी को शक हो तो वह गूगल में "muhammad and his eternal erection "सर्च करके देख लें

33 comments:

Ejaz Khan said...

Jo bhi tune likha hai iske liye tujhe marna padega....tu apna naam bata...

अखिल भारत हिन्‍दू महासभा said...

ye to vakt batayega betey.

Siddharth Jain said...

marna to ek din sabhi ko hai... lekin jo likha hai sahi likha hai... muslims are fuckers... osama is also such example

Zavvar said...

Krishan ji aap ittne laundiya baaz kyun the......kabhi ladki ko kapde pehne pasand kiya.......kappde chura lethe the......taaki wo bahar aayein aur aap unhein dekhen.......He Krishan.......tum ittne natkhat kyun the.......tumhein dekh karr mann kartha hai ke mein Hindu ban jaoon.........He Krishan tumne apne mama ki ladki ko vivah ke liye chuna.......koi aur Gopi chunn lethe..Mujhe abb Hindu banna hai......ishq ki tho anumati tho mill hi jayegi.......Mohammad tho ek Paighambar hi the......aap tho khud ek Bhagwan the.....Ladkiyan chhedne ki prerana aap se hi mili.....issliye mein Muslim dharm chod kar appne aap ko Hindu kehlana pasand karoonga......shaya Bhagwan ke naamp par appne behen betiyon ko chhedne ki anumati log denge......

Zavvar said...

Waise Islam mein hain ke kisi ke jhoonte Khuda ko bhi bura na kaho.......issliye meine ooper ek ghalathi karr di aur Hindu bann gaya......Jai shri Natkhat Krishan Murali wale..

Anonymous said...

zavvar krishna ki ek premika thi sirf radha aur kabhi bhi unka koi galat samband unsey nahi tha aur jab gopiya nangi snan kar rahi thi tab krishna ney unhey kaha ki bhagvan sey chama mango hath jodkar. us samaya krisna ki umra 6 sal ki thi. lekin aapkey mohammad kya kiyey kaya karaye isey aap
http://bhandafodu.blogspot.com/2010/08/blog-post_12.html

Raza said...

Jisne ye likha hai wo sabse kamina aur harami insan hai aur jo iska sath de rahe hai

Raza said...

Jis nabi ko hau mante hai uske bare me manghdat bate likhne wala kafir tumara anjam bahut bura hoga tu duniya me to jalega jahhnam me bhi tujhe rahat nahi milegi

Jai Hindu said...

Zavvar ji bahas ki koi ant nahi lekin main ek bat puchna chaunga aap se ki agar islam main agar ye batain nahi likhi hai to kya reason hai ki aaj ISLAM atank ka parayay ban chuka hai. Kyun Muslims Islam ke naam par ATANK faila rahe hai.

Please bataine!

Anonymous said...

Namaskaar to all my dear Hindu Friends,
Ham sab jante hai is desh ke hindu kitne udaar hain.Jis sanskriti ne bhi yeha jagah mangi mila.is desh mai nafrat ki politics kabhi nahi chali hai na chalegi.Aaap kaun hai jo hamare sabhi hindu bhai ke man ko nafrat se bhar rahe hain mai nahi janta mai to bas itna janta hoon pure duniya mai agar musalman kahin surachit hai to hamare india mai.Aur ek bat ka zikr karunga kattarta se bachen aaj pakistan bhikhmanga mulk kun hai sirf kattarta ke tarah.kattarta kalyug ka bhasmasur hai sab se pehle presray dene waloon ko hi jalata hai pakistan ki tarah, dekhiye mere pyeare mitr. Pkistanmai, iraq, iran,lgbhag sare desho main musalman aaj mara jaraha kaun hindu ja ke maar rahahi, wo agar mar rahe hain to sirf issiliye ke unhone kattarta ko pala hai.isiliye main aap sab logoon ko S purshottam Shri Ram, Shri Krishn ka wasta detahoon ke kattarta mat phylao.isse hamre des mai nafrat ki ek aag failigi aur ye bhasmasur hamara sharwnash krke rahega. Jai Hind

shivraj rathore said...

me b yhi kh rha hu......kyoki sb ko pta h kon kesa .......hmara hindu dharm adi anadi kal se chla aa rha h ....or hm kisi dusre dharm ki burae b ni kr rhe ...hm sirf logo ko sacchaee bta rhe h....mujhe to apne hindu hone pr garv h.....jai hind........

Muhammad Imran said...

Kitna jhooth failaoge.

KING-slave of Allah said...

Mr.BN Sharma...Shame on you....

How can you sick people lie so openly.... about others.... Kya yahi sikhaya hai tarika....

Indeed you are one of hypocrite Lier.... You every claim is bullshit Lie ...

May of them are exposed here ...


http://islamgreatreligion.wordpress.com

VICKY ANAND said...

12 year of RAMA
12 YEARS FOR RAMA, BUT ONE DAY TO RAVAN
To retrieve his wife from devil Ravan, ‘god’ Rama sought the help of Hanuman, a monkey ‘god’.

Hanuman agreed to help Rama bring his wife back on condition that ‘god’ Rama in turn help him (Hanuman) to kill his twin brother prior to undertaking the mission.

It took more than twelve years for Hanuman to build a bridge and accomplish the task, while Ravan just took Sita and flew to Sri Lanka in just one day’s time.

Who is more powerful- ‘God’ Rama or devil Ravan?

Would a ‘god’ seek the help of another ‘god’ to murder a third god?
2* If Hanuman could fly carrying big mountains, he should have in the first instance carried and flown ‘god’ Rama to Sri Lanka, which would have resulted in early rescue of Sita.

* Who knows what Ravan might have done to Sita during this period of twelve years?

Definitely a devil would have done only “devilish” things!
3-Before helping ‘god’ Rama, Hanuman made Rama shoot his own twin brother in the back and only then did Hanuman help ‘god’ Rama.

How can a “god” indulge in such a criminal act for personal gain?
4-When ‘God’ Rama was told to go to the forest, he mournfully revealed to his mother:

It has been ordained that I have to lose the kingdom, forego the princely comforts and the tasty MEAT-DISHES. (Ayothia Kandam, 20, 26, 94th Chapters).
5-In Mr. C.R. Sreenivasalyengar’s translation of Valmiki Ramayana, it says:

‘Though Rama had married Sita to be the queen, he married many other wives for sexual pleasure in accordance with the royal customs.

(Ayodhya Kandam 8th Chapter, Page 28). (The term “Rama’s wives” has been used in many places in Ramayana).

VICKY ANAND said...

8-RAMA’S DEATH

Rama, like an ordinary man, fell down into the river and DROWNED

(Uttara Kandam, Chapter 106).

How can a “god” die? Who will then look after the affairs of the world?

LUSTFUL SITA VS THE “IMPOTENT” RAMA

Sita told Rama “You are no better than a woman monger who lets his wife for hire and makes his livelihood. You want to be profited by my prostitution”.

Sita also told Rama “You lack in POTENCE, manners and charm” and she called her husband a simpleton.

As soon as Sita stepped into Ravan’s palace, her love towards Ravan grew more.
(Aranya Kandam, Chapter 54).

When at length Rama asked Sita to swear about her chastity, she declined and died.
(Uttar Kandam, Chapter 97)

VICKY ANAND said...

Kukuvavathy, sister-in-law of Rama, said to him -

“Oh Elder! How you love Sita more than you love yourself!

Come with me and see what really is in your lovely wife’s heart. Still she could not forget that fellow Ravan.

Drawing a picture of Ravan on a hand-fan and pressing it closely to her bosom.

She is lying on your bed with eyes closed thinking on and rejoicing at Ravan’s glories.

Rama sighed and went out to Sita’s house.

There she was found sleeping pressing to her breast the hand-fan on which Ravan’s picture was drawn.

(This is found in pages 199, 200 of the Bengali Ramayana written by Mrs. Chandravathi).

VICKY ANAND said...

hindu god brahma
Brahma is one of the 3 main gods - Trimurti - of the Hindu pantheon. He is the creator of the universe. Sarasvati, who became the wife of her own father, was the daughter of Brahma. There are 2 stories about her genesis in the `Saraswati Purana'. One is that Brahma created his beautiful daughter Saraswati direct from his `vital strength' or seminal fluid. The other is that Brahma used to collect his semen in a pot, credit to the celestial beauty Urvasi. Brahma's semen in the pot gave birth to the sage Agastya, and Agastya in turn gave birth to Saraswati. Thus, Saraswati had no mother.
2-This daughter or grand-daughter of Brahma is the Hindu goddess of learning. When Brahma saw the beauty of Saraswati he became amorous. To escape from her father's passionate approach Saraswati ran to the lands in all four directions, but she could not escape from her father. She succumbed to Brahma's wish. Brahma and his daughter Saraswati lived as husband and wife indulging in incest for 100 years. They had a son Swayambhumaru and a daughter Satarupa. Through the incest of Brahma's son and daughter Brahma got two grandsons and two grand-daughters." This is why Brahma is not worshiped anywhere in India, except Pushkar in Rajasthan.
3-"On seeing his beautiful daughter Padma, Brahma was sexually excited. He wooed his daughter and wanted to copulate with her. How could a daughter give consent to her own father? Padma refused. Brahma could not give up his desire. He began to quote the Vedas to convince her that there was nothing wrong in having sex with anyone, anytime, anywhere for the sake of giving birth to a child. "
-- ( Puran )

This is the Vedic verse Brahma quoted to justify incest :
Mathara Mupathya, susara Mupatithe, Puthrartheetha.
Sagamarthi, Napathra loka, nasthee thath.
Saravam paravo vindu ha, dasmath Puthrar tham.
Matharam suransathee Rehathee
- ( Vedas, cited in Puran )

VICKY ANAND said...

Translated this verse means
" This is the sanskrit sloka Brahma quoted to his daughter. The sacred verse enjoins, that for the sake of a child one can enjoy her own sister or daughter, without any sin attached to it.
( Puran )"
4-Yet, the Brahmins give some strange `justifications' for this act, in order to fool the non-Brahmins into practicing incest and destroying their race forever :

"Brahma followed Savitri [ Padma or Sarasvati ], married her, and they lived together in a lotus for one hundred years. The Purana [ Matsya ] then points out that no question arises regarding prohibited acts of the gods since they do not reap the fruits of their karma (actions) as do mortals. A further justification of Brahma's action is given by noting that Brahma is the lord of the Vedas and Savitri is the goddess of the Vedas. They therefore are inseparable, and to unite the Vedas with the sacred prayer can surely be no evil."
( Spellman, p.30 )
5-Saraswati Cursed Brahma


Angered by his display of unbridled passion Saraswati cursed Brahma, “You have filled the world with longing that is the seed of unhappiness. You have fettered the soul in the flesh. You are not worthy of reverence. May there be hardly any temple or festival in your name.”


So it came to pass that there are only two temples of Brahma in India; one at Pushkar, Rajistan and the other in Kumbhakonam, Tamil Nadu.


Undaunted by the curse, Brahma continued to cast his lustful looks upon Saraswati. He gave himself a fifth head to enhance his gaze.

VICKY ANAND said...

Did you take notice of that? sanatan dharma??


Hindus in many communities are talking about degradation and exploitation of women in islam ( in vanity )
well for now atleast we'll refer to the thier books on this issue

1.Discrimination
Almighty God, you have created this womb. Women may be born somewhere else but sons should be born from this womb" - Atharva Ved 6/11/3

"O Husband protect the son to be born. Do not make him a women" - Atharva Ved 2/3/23

'Rig Veda' censures women by saying:
"Lord Indra himself has said that women has very little intelligence. She cannot be thaught" - Rig Ved 8/33/17

At another place it is written:
"There cannot be any friendship with a women. Her heart is more cruel than heyna" - Rig Ved 10/95/15.

'Yajur Ved (Taitriya Sanhita)'m- "Womns code says that the women are withouth energy. They should not get a share in property. Even to the wicked they speak in feeble manner" - Yajur Ved 6/5/8/2

Shatpath Puran, preachings of the 'Yajur Veda' clubs women, 'shudras' (untouchables), doga, crows together and says falsehood, sin and gloom remain integrated in them. (14/1/1/31)

"Women are powerless, have no inheritance, and speak more humbly than even a bad man." -- Krishna Yajur Veda Taittiriya Samhita 6:5:8:2.

2. exploitation
"When father had sexual intercourse with his daughter, then with the help of earth he released his semen and at that time the Righteeous Devas (deities) formed this 'Vartrashak (Rudra) Devta' (Pledge keeper diety named Rudra)" - Atharva Veda (20/96/15).

"O men, sow a seed in this fertile women" - Atharva Veda 14/1 (talking about joint sex of men with one women!)

Abhishek said...

sun be (vicky)madarchod bhadve sale pehle theek se itihas padh valmiki ji ka sanskrit ramayan padh tab yaha aa ke bakwas kar. bahot se bhadvo ne ramayan likha hai usi me se wo bengali bhi hoga.
sale tu to musalmano se bhi jyada khatarnak hai madarchod kahi dikh gaya jo mahakal ki saugandh pran kheench loonga.

Anonymous said...

kya baat hai Abhishek Vicky par itna gussa kyu ho rahe ho.... sirf isliye ki usne Sachhai likhi hai..... tumne use kahi dikh jaane par jaan se maar daalne ki dhamki di.... lekin musalmaano ke khilaaf unke dhrm ke khilaaf likha to tum hi batao musalmaano ki kya pratikriya honi chahiye..... Vishal, New Delhi

Anonymous said...

BAAP RE BAAP AAP LOG TO JO MAN M AA RAHA H WOHI LIKH RAHE H AUR HAWALA D RAHE H VEDO KA .SHIT ON U OKEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.

waqi rasheed said...

sri Krishna had 16000 wives ...see mahabharata

Dont criticised anyone religon or faith..because its not are traditions..its gives us nothoing except loosing..due to these types of thinking will crushed our society..as well as nation...are you patriotic ?? or seperatist..its upon you and us

waqi rasheed said...

Dont criticised anyone religon or faith..because its not are traditions..its gives us nothoing except loosing..due to these types of thinking will crushed our society..as well as nation...are you patriotic ?? or seperatist..its upon you and us

Vickey Pandit said...

vickey..
hmmm..
yeh itna gyan kaha se laaye ho..
sanskrit ka anuvaad sahi tarike se nahi kar paye tum..
ya phir uska thik tarah se bahavarth nahi samajh sake..in sabhi vedo ki suktiyo ko sanskrit me padho aur kisi yogya vyakti se iska arth samajh lo..
mjhe lagta hai sahi vaidic dharm sanskar aur sanskriti ka palan nahi kar paye.
tumhare mata pita..
ek baar unse bhi jake is vishay me unki rai bhi jaan lo, ho sakta hai wo aapko kuch sahi gyan de de.
ishwar aapke bhaala kare..!!!

AMAN said...

Allah ne to apni hi beti ka rape kar diya tha . Mulle ka aalah ko ek aankh bhi nahi tha aur salla aayas bhi tha . jab harek aadmi ka pic. hota hai to mulle ke allah ka kyu nahi ? jab mulle ka bachha Hindu ke rupe me peda hota hai to mulla uslee kitni bari saja deta hai ?

Sally H said...

Hey everybody listen prophet lived a life of normal person.and a man who dies of poison his penis erects

Satya Raj said...

Abe madarchod katuo tum saale bolte ho ki bhagwan nhi mar sakte hai ..to kya tumhara madarchod khuda mohhmad hazrat kaise mar gaya madarchod. ..or hussein youdh me mara use to sale tum katue ne hi maara tha ..salo bhagwan srikrishna ke bare me galat bolte ho haa unki 16000 wife thi we sv se unhone pichle janam me jab we gopiya rishi muni the tv unhe vardaan deya tha ki agle janam me we unse prem karenge..salo sahi jankari ke baad baat kar

Marksons Education Consultant said...

Teri maa ki chud Ejaz Khan Teri maa, behen beti ko nangaa karke masjid mein chodungaa madarch
od

Marksons Education Consultant said...

Mr. VICKY ANAND this happens, the persons like you take birth when more than 5 persons rape a woman.My condolence is with your mother and you because you have so many father's so you think everybody is like that

ALOK SRIVASTAVA said...

Hinduon ke ek hone ka time as Gaya hai warns ye Muslims fir se India ka batwaara karenge is baar asdam, Bihar desh se alag ka denge

sachin bajwan said...

jis tarah nalayak aulad apne pitah ka naam kharab karti hai. Uske kahe anusaar na chal kar apne marji se galat kaam karte hai toh samaj me badnaami pitah ki hi hoti hai. Bas usi tarah muslim quran me kahe vastvik arth ko na samajh kar uske opposite kaam karte hai wehi log muhhamad or islam ko badnaam karate hai.

Isme koi sak nahi ki muhhamad sahab allah ke paigambar the or unhone ek khuda par hi sajda karne ko kaha. quran me khuda ke dwara muslimo ko sahi raste par chalne ki hidayat di hai. Per jo muslim quran k anussar nahi chalte we muslim nahi kaafir hai.

Khuda kaisa hai:
1. sabka sukh chahne wala hai.
2. Sabse prem karne wala hai.
3. Sabko jhoot se nikal kar sach me lane wala hai.
4. Sab par daya karne wala hai.
Toh uske chahne wale bhi to usi ki tarah hone chahiye.

Quran k naam per atyachaar or julm karne wale kabhi bhi khuda ke chahne wale nahi ho sakte. Khuda ka qehar aise logon per jaroor hota hai. Jo quran ke galat arth bata kar dusro ko gumrah karte hai.

sachin bajwan said...

jis tarah nalayak aulad apne pitah ka naam kharab karti hai. Uske kahe anusaar na chal kar apne marji se galat kaam karte hai toh samaaj me badnaami pitah ki hi hoti hai. Bas usi tarah muslim quran me kahe vastvik arth ko na samajh kar uske opposite kaam karte hai wehi log muhhamad or islam ko badnaam karate hai.

Isme koi sak nahi ki muhhamad sahab allah ke paigambar the or unhone ek khuda par hi sajda karne ko kaha. quran me khuda ke dwara muslimo ko sahi raste par chalne ki hidayat di hai. Per jo muslim quran k anussar nahi chalte we muslim nahi kaafir hai.

Khuda kaisa hai:
1. sabka sukh chahne wala hai.
2. Sabse prem karne wala hai.
3. Sabko jhoot se nikal kar sach me lane wala hai.
4. Sab par daya karne wala hai.
Toh uske chahne wale bhi to usi ki tarah hone chahiye.

Quran k naam per atyachaar or julm karne wale kabhi bhi khuda ke chahne wale nahi ho sakte. Khuda ka qehar aise logon per jaroor hota hai. Jo quran ke galat arth bata kar dusro ko gumrah karte hai.